Download: pdf (16 pages; 1.3 Mb)
Abstract:
What is the underlying representation of lexical knowledge? Howdo we
knowwhether a given string of letters is a word, whereas another string of
letters is not? There are two competing models of lexical processing in the
literature. The first proposes that we rely on mental lexicons. The second
claims there are no mental lexicons; we identify certain items as words based
on semantic knowledge.Thus, the former approach---themultiple-systemsview
posits that lexical and semantic processing are subserved by separate systems,
whereas the latter approach---the single-system view---holds that the two are
interdependent. Semantic dementia patients, who have a cross-modal semantic
impairment, show an accompanying and related lexical deficit. These findings
support the single-system approach. However, a report of an SD patient whose
impairment on lexical decision was not related to his semantic deficits in
item-specific ways has presented a challenge to this view. If the two types of
processing rely on a common system, then shouldn't damage impair the same
items on all tasks?
We present a single-system model of lexical and
semantic processing, where there are no lexicons, and performance on lexical
decision involves the activation of semantic representations. We show how,
when these representations are damaged, accuracy on semantic and lexical tasks
falls off together, but not necessarily on the same set of items. These
findings are congruent with the patient data. We provide an explicit
explanation of this pattern of results in our model, by defining and measuring
the effects of two orthogonal factors---spelling consistency and concept
consistency.
Copyright Notice: The documents distributed here have been provided as a means to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work on a noncommercial basis. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the authors or by other copyright holders, notwithstanding that they have offered their works here electronically. It is understood that all persons copying this information will adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.